Smart contracts engineered like critical infrastructure.
Production Solidity systems engineered for correctness: token standards, protocol logic, access control and testing, ready for independent review.
Overview
Our contract practice treats every deployment as critical infrastructure. We start with threat modeling, define access-control matrices up front, and write Foundry test suites — unit, fuzz and invariant — alongside the implementation. Contracts ship with NatSpec docs, deployment runbooks and coverage reports above 90%.
Capabilities
- Solidity system design and implementation
- ERC-20, ERC-721, ERC-1155 tokens
- Upgradeable proxies (UUPS, Transparent)
- Access control and multisig governance
- Gas optimization passes
- Foundry + Hardhat test suites
What We Build
- Token and vesting systems
- Escrow and milestone contracts
- Governance and timelock modules
- Credential and registry contracts
- Periphery and periphery automation
Technology
Solidity · Foundry · Hardhat · OpenZeppelin · Chainlink · Slither · Tenderly
Development Process
Threat modeling → contract design → implementation with tests → internal review → review-preparation package → deployment verification on mainnet.
Deliverables
Review-ready contracts, executable test suite with coverage report, deployment scripts, and NatSpec documentation.
Relevant Projects
We prepare contracts to audit standard and coordinate independent third-party audits through partner firms — we never mark our own homework.
We recommend the pattern per system — immutable where trust demands it, UUPS with timelocks where iteration matters — and document the trade-offs.
Yes. We start with a code review and test-gap analysis, then harden and extend.
Related Services
Need contracts you can defend in review?
Send us the spec or the repo. We'll scope the engineering and testing plan.